Usually, Yes—But Only Within the Geographic Area Allowed by the Court

One of the most common concerns parents have after a divorce or custody case is whether the other parent can simply move away with the child.

​

In most Texas cases, the answer is no—not without limitations.

​

Although the parent with the exclusive right to designate the child’s primary residence generally decides where the child lives, that authority is often restricted by a geographic restriction contained in the Final Decree of Divorce or Final Order in Suit Affecting the Parent-Child Relationship.

​

Most Texas custody orders require that the child’s primary residence remain within a particular geographic area, such as a county, a group of contiguous counties, or another specifically defined region. As long as the geographic restriction remains in effect, the parent with the right to determine the child’s residence generally cannot move the child outside that area without either the agreement of the other parent or a subsequent court order.

​

Texas Law Encourages Frequent and Continuing Contact With Both Parents

Texas public policy strongly favors children maintaining meaningful relationships with both parents.

​

Section 153.001 of the Texas Family Code provides that it is the public policy of this state to assure that children have frequent and continuing contact with parents who have shown the ability to act in the child’s best interest.

​

Likewise, Section 153.133 authorizes the court to grant one parent the exclusive right to designate the child’s primary residence while also recognizing that conservatorship orders should preserve the rights and responsibilities of both parents whenever appropriate.

​

These provisions reflect an important principle of Texas family law: children generally benefit from having both parents actively involved in their lives. Geographic restrictions are frequently imposed because they help preserve that relationship by allowing the non-primary parent to exercise regular possession without the burdens created by long-distance travel.

​

Why Do Courts Impose Geographic Restrictions?

A geographic restriction is intended to balance two competing interests.

​

On one hand, the parent with the exclusive right to designate the child’s primary residence must have sufficient flexibility to make ordinary parenting decisions. On the other hand, the child should continue to have regular and meaningful access to the other parent.

​

If one parent could relocate hundreds or thousands of miles away immediately after the divorce, the other parent’s possession schedule could become impractical or impossible. Weekend visitation, school activities, extracurricular events, medical appointments, and ordinary parenting involvement may no longer be feasible.

​

For that reason, geographic restrictions are common in Texas custody orders and are designed to preserve the child’s ongoing relationship with both parents.

​

During a Divorce, Parents Usually Cannot Move the Child

During a pending divorce or custody case, courts generally seek to preserve the status quo until the case can be fully decided.

​

Many counties in Texas have standing orders that automatically prohibit either parent from changing the child’s primary residence or removing the child from the State of Texas while the lawsuit is pending. These standing orders are intended to prevent one parent from gaining an unfair advantage by relocating the child before the court has an opportunity to determine conservatorship and possession.

​

Similarly, many standing orders prohibit a parent from unilaterally changing the child’s school during the litigation. Maintaining the child’s existing home, school, and routines often provides stability while the case is pending.

​

Although standing orders vary from county to county, preserving the child’s existing circumstances is a common objective during family law litigation.

​

Changing a Child’s Residence During the Case Usually Requires Temporary Orders

If a parent wishes to move the child’s residence or enroll the child in a different school while the divorce or custody case is pending, court approval is often required.

​

In most cases, that approval is sought through a temporary orders hearing, where the court evaluates whether the proposed move serves the child’s best interest.

​

The judge may consider factors such as the reasons for the proposed relocation, the effect on the child’s education, the availability of extended family, the impact on the other parent’s possession schedule, employment opportunities, safety concerns, and the overall stability of the child.

Parents should not assume that they may relocate simply because they believe the move would benefit the child. Acting without court approval can create significant legal problems and may negatively affect the custody case.

​

Can a Geographic Restriction Be Removed After the Divorce?

Yes.

​

A geographic restriction is not necessarily permanent.

​

A parent may later ask the court to modify the restriction if circumstances have materially and substantially changed and the requested modification would be in the child’s best interest under Chapter 156 of the Texas Family Code.

​

One common example occurs when the parent who previously exercised regular possession relocates outside the restricted geographic area. If that parent no longer lives within the area the restriction was designed to protect, the court may determine that the purpose of the restriction has changed.

​

Likewise, there may be circumstances in which removing or expanding the geographic restriction better serves the child’s best interest, such as significant employment opportunities, educational needs, extended family support, or other substantial changes in circumstances.

Each case, however, is highly fact-specific.

​

Lifting a Geographic Restriction Is One of the Most Difficult Modification Cases

Although geographic restrictions may be modified, courts are generally extremely hesitant to remove them.

​

Texas courts recognize that relocating a child often affects the child’s relationship with the other parent, extended family, school, friends, extracurricular activities, and community. A long-distance move may substantially reduce the non-moving parent’s ability to participate in the child’s daily life.

​

Because Texas public policy favors frequent and continuing contact with both parents, judges carefully scrutinize relocation requests. A parent seeking to remove or expand a geographic restriction must typically present compelling evidence demonstrating that the proposed move is in the child’s best interest.

​

Simply obtaining a better job, wanting to live closer to relatives, or preferring another city is not automatically enough to justify lifting the restriction. The court considers the totality of the circumstances and balances the benefits of the move against the impact it will have on the child’s relationship with the other parent.

​

Relocation cases are among the most heavily litigated and fact-intensive disputes in Texas family law.

​

Every Relocation Case Is Different

No two relocation cases are alike.

​

The child’s age, educational needs, relationship with each parent, availability of extended family, employment opportunities, transportation issues, the reasons for the proposed move, and the effect on the existing possession schedule may all influence the court’s decision.

​

Because relocation cases often determine whether a parent will continue to have frequent in-person contact with a child, careful preparation and thorough presentation of the evidence are critical.

​

Fergus & Tomanka Represents Parents in Relocation Cases

Whether you are seeking permission to relocate with your child or opposing a proposed move, relocation disputes require a careful understanding of the Texas Family Code and the facts unique to your family.

​

At Fergus & Tomanka, we regularly represent parents in cases involving geographic restrictions, temporary relocation requests, school changes, custody modifications, and interstate parenting disputes. We help clients evaluate whether a proposed move is legally permissible, seek appropriate court orders when necessary, and present evidence focused on what matters most under Texas law—the best interests of the child.