Does Texas Presume Equal Parenting Time?

One of the most common questions parents ask during a divorce or custody case is whether Texas presumes a 50/50 possession schedule.

​

The answer is both yes and no.

​

Texas does not have a statute that expressly presumes an equal possession schedule in every case. However, in 2021, the Legislature significantly expanded the Expanded Standard Possession Order (ESPO). Under Texas Family Code § 153.3171, the Expanded Standard Possession Order is now presumed to be in the child’s best interest for children three years of age and older, unless the court finds that another schedule is appropriate.

​

Although the Expanded Standard Possession Order is not a true 50/50 schedule, it provides substantially more parenting time than the traditional Standard Possession Order and, in many cases, approaches an equal division of time.

​

Parents seeking a true equal possession schedule must generally demonstrate that such an arrangement is in the child’s best interest.

​

There Is No Automatic Right to a 50/50 Schedule

The Texas Family Code requires every conservatorship and possession order to be based upon the best interest of the child. See Tex. Fam. Code § 153.002.

​

A court will not order a 50/50 schedule simply because one parent requests it. Instead, the judge evaluates whether an equal schedule is practical for the child and whether both parents are capable of successfully implementing it over the long term.

​

Every family is different. A schedule that works well for one child may create significant problems for another.

​

The Parents Must Be Able to Make the Schedule Work

One of the most important considerations is logistics.

​

An equal possession schedule generally works best when both parents live relatively close to one another and both can reliably transport the child to and from school, daycare, extracurricular activities, medical appointments, and other daily obligations.

​

If one parent begins work very early in the morning, travels extensively for employment, or has an unpredictable work schedule, maintaining a true 50/50 schedule may become difficult.

​

Conversely, parents who work from home, maintain flexible schedules, or have reliable childcare arrangements are often in a better position to successfully exercise equal parenting time.

​

The court is interested in whether the proposed schedule is sustainable—not simply whether it sounds fair.

​

The Court Will Consider Each Parent’s Historical Involvement

Courts frequently examine the role each parent played before the litigation began.

​

Evidence that both parents routinely attended medical appointments, participated in school conferences, coached extracurricular activities, helped with homework, transported the child to school, prepared meals, attended sporting events, and participated in the child’s daily routine may support a request for equal parenting time.

​

On the other hand, if one parent historically served as the child’s primary caregiver while the other had only limited day-to-day involvement, the court may question whether an immediate transition to an equal schedule serves the child’s best interests.

​

The court often looks at the parenting relationship that existed before the lawsuit—not simply the relationship each parent hopes to have afterward.

​

A 50/50 Schedule Does Not Automatically Eliminate Child Support

Perhaps the biggest misconception in Texas family law is that equal parenting time means neither parent pays child support.

​

Texas law contains no such rule.

​

Child support is governed by Chapter 154 of the Texas Family Code, while possession schedules are governed by Chapter 153. Although the issues are related, they are analyzed separately.

​

Even if parents exercise equal possession, one parent may earn substantially more income than the other. The court may conclude that guideline child support, or some modified amount, remains appropriate to meet the child’s needs.

​

Courts are often skeptical when parents appear to request a 50/50 schedule primarily to avoid paying child support rather than because the schedule genuinely benefits the child.

​

For that reason, parents seeking equal possession should be prepared to explain why the proposed schedule serves the child’s best interests independent of any financial considerations.

​

A 50/50 Schedule Is Not Appropriate for Every Child

An equal possession schedule is not automatically the best arrangement simply because it divides time equally.

​

As children mature, their educational demands, extracurricular activities, social relationships, employment, and personal preferences often become increasingly important.

​

Some older children thrive under a weekly exchange schedule, while others find constant transitions between households disruptive. A teenager involved in athletics, advanced academic programs, or part-time employment may have different needs than a preschool child.

​

The court evaluates the child’s age, maturity, developmental needs, educational stability, and overall well-being when determining whether an equal schedule is appropriate.

​

Common 50/50 Possession Schedules

Several different schedules are commonly used when parents agree upon or the court orders equal parenting time.

​

A 2-2-5-5 schedule allows one parent to exercise possession every Monday and Tuesday, while the other parent exercises possession every Wednesday and Thursday. The parents then alternate the three-day weekends, resulting in each parent consistently having the same weekdays every week while alternating longer blocks of parenting time.

​

A 7-7 schedule provides each parent with one full week at a time. Exchanges usually occur on the same day each week, reducing the number of transitions between households. This schedule often works well for older children who are comfortable spending longer periods in each home.

​

A 2-2-3 schedule, sometimes referred to as a “wrap” schedule, alternates possession every two or three days. One parent has the child for two days, the other parent has the child for the next two days, and the first parent then has the child for three days. The following week the pattern reverses. This arrangement results in frequent contact with both parents but also requires frequent exchanges.

​

Each schedule has advantages and disadvantages, and no single schedule is appropriate for every family.

​

Flexibility Often Determines Success

Equal possession requires a high degree of cooperation between parents.

​

Parents must communicate regarding school activities, medical appointments, extracurricular schedules, holidays, transportation, and unexpected changes. Even a carefully drafted possession order cannot anticipate every circumstance that may arise over the course of a child’s upbringing.

​

Parents who demonstrate flexibility, communicate respectfully, and remain focused on the child’s needs are generally more successful in maintaining an equal parenting arrangement over time.

​

Fergus & Tomanka Helps Parents Develop Parenting Schedules That Work

Every family has different needs, and no possession schedule is appropriate in every case. Whether you are seeking an Expanded Standard Possession Order, a true 50/50 schedule, or another customized parenting plan, the focus should always remain on what arrangement best serves your child’s long-term interests.

​

At Fergus & Tomanka, we represent parents throughout Central Texas in divorce, SAPCR, modification, and enforcement proceedings involving conservatorship and possession. We work with our clients to develop practical parenting schedules that comply with the Texas Family Code while addressing the unique circumstances of each family.