LEGAL RESOURCES
Parental Alienation in Texas Child Custody Cases
​
What Is Parental Alienation?
Few issues in Texas family law generate more disagreement than allegations of parental alienation. Parents frequently believe that the other parent is attempting to damage their relationship with the child by making negative comments, interfering with visitation, encouraging the child to reject the other parent, or involving the child in adult disputes.
​
Although these allegations arise regularly in custody litigation, it is important to understand that parental alienation is not a recognized psychiatric diagnosis. It is not included in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5-TR) and is not recognized as a stand-alone mental illness.
​
Instead, the phrase “parental alienation” is generally used to describe a pattern of conduct that may interfere with or damage the relationship between a child and the other parent.
​
For judges, the label itself is usually less important than the conduct giving rise to the allegation.
Texas Law Encourages Children to Have Relationships With Both Parents
Texas public policy strongly favors children maintaining meaningful relationships with both parents whenever doing so is consistent with the child’s best interests.
​
Texas Family Code § 153.001 provides that it is the public policy of this state to assure that children have frequent and continuing contact with parents who have demonstrated the ability to act in the child’s best interest. The statute also encourages parents to share in the rights and duties of raising their children after separation.
​
Likewise, Texas Family Code § 153.002 provides that the best interest of the child is always the court’s primary consideration when determining conservatorship and possession.
​
Accordingly, conduct that intentionally damages the child’s relationship with the other parent may become relevant to the court’s best-interest analysis.
Courts Focus on Conduct Rather Than Labels
Simply accusing the other parent of “parental alienation” is not enough.
​
Texas judges generally focus on specific conduct supported by admissible evidence rather than psychological terminology.
​
Examples of conduct that may become relevant include repeatedly denying court-ordered possession, refusing to encourage the child’s relationship with the other parent, making disparaging remarks about the other parent in the child’s presence, discussing the litigation with the child, encouraging the child to choose sides, interfering with telephone or electronic communication, withholding important school or medical information, scheduling unnecessary activities during the other parent’s possession, or attempting to make the child feel guilty for enjoying time with the other parent.
​
The court evaluates the totality of the circumstances rather than any single incident.
Parents Should Never Place a Child in the Middle
of the Divorce
Children should not become participants in adult litigation.
​
Parents should avoid asking children to report on the other household, deliver messages between parents, read court pleadings, attend attorney meetings, or discuss financial issues such as child support or property division.
​
Likewise, parents should never coach a child regarding what to say to a judge, Guardian ad Litem, custody evaluator, counselor, or other professional involved in the case.
​
Research consistently demonstrates that prolonged parental conflict is associated with increased anxiety, depression, behavioral problems, and emotional distress in children. Courts therefore expect parents to minimize conflict and allow children to maintain healthy relationships with both parents whenever it is safe to do so.
A Child’s Refusal to Visit Does Not Automatically Mean Alienation
One of the most common misconceptions is that every child who refuses visitation has been alienated.
​
That is not necessarily true.
​
Children sometimes resist spending time with a parent because of conflict between the parents, but they may also do so because of family violence, abuse, neglect, substance abuse, inconsistent parenting, mental health issues, poor communication, developmental challenges, or other legitimate concerns.
​
For that reason, experienced judges are careful not to assume that every difficult parent-child relationship results from alienating conduct.
​
Each case must be evaluated according to its own facts.
Evidence Matters
Like every other issue in family law, allegations of parental alienation must be supported by evidence.
​
Relevant evidence may include text messages, emails, recordings that were lawfully obtained, school records, counseling records, witness testimony, social media communications, parenting calendars, possession records, photographs, and testimony from teachers, counselors, or other individuals familiar with the family.
​
General accusations rarely persuade the court. Judges are far more interested in documented patterns of conduct than isolated disagreements between parents.
Experts May Become Involved
In highly contested custody cases, the court may appoint professionals to assist in evaluating the family dynamics.
​
Depending upon the circumstances, the court may order a child custody evaluation under Chapter 107 of the Texas Family Code, appoint a Guardian ad Litem, appoint an Amicus Attorney, or, in appropriate circumstances, order a psychological evaluation of one or both parents.
​
These professionals do not decide the case. Instead, they investigate the facts, interview the parties and the child, review records, and provide recommendations that may assist the court in determining the child’s best interests.
Remedies Available to the Court
If the court concludes that one parent’s conduct is significantly interfering with the child’s relationship with the other parent, it has broad authority to fashion orders designed to protect the child’s best interests.
​
Depending upon the evidence, the court may enforce an existing possession order, modify conservatorship or possession, appoint a Guardian ad Litem or Amicus Attorney, order counseling or reunification therapy, require parenting classes, modify exchange procedures, or enter other orders reasonably necessary to protect the parent-child relationship.
​
Every remedy depends upon the facts presented in the individual case. There is no automatic consequence simply because one parent alleges parental alienation.
Recent Texas Cases Continue to Focus on the Child’s Best Interest
Texas appellate courts continue to emphasize that custody decisions must be based upon the child’s best interests rather than labels or generalized allegations. While courts recognize that one parent may improperly interfere with the child’s relationship with the other parent, the ultimate question remains whether the evidence demonstrates that a modification or other relief is necessary to serve the child’s best interests under Texas Family Code Chapter 153.
​
The focus remains on the facts—not the terminology used to describe them.
Fergus & Tomanka Represents Parents in High-Conflict Custody Cases
Allegations of parental alienation often involve complex factual disputes requiring careful investigation, strategic discovery, and the presentation of admissible evidence. Successfully litigating these cases requires more than broad accusations; it requires documenting patterns of conduct and demonstrating how those actions affect the child’s best interests under Texas law.
​
At Fergus & Tomanka, we represent parents throughout Central Texas in high-conflict custody disputes, enforcement actions, modifications, child custody evaluations, Guardian ad Litem investigations, and other complex conservatorship matters. We work closely with our clients to develop the evidence necessary to protect the parent-child relationship while keeping the focus where Texas law requires—on the best interests of the child.
Call (512) 291-6952 to setup a consultation with one of our attorneys OR simply Make An Appointment on your own!
These issues can be quite difficult to handle on your own due to the legal complexity and emotionally-charged nature of the proceedings. It’s best to consult with an experienced family law attorney in your area.